Skip to content
Flow for ethics committees

Organize ethical protocol admission.

The researcher receives a link and uploads all mandatory documentation. The bot validates nothing is missing before the committee meets to evaluate.

Study protocols Informed consents Researcher CVs

What arrives before the call

Your team decides with documents, context and priority in the same view.

04

key items per case

03

workflow steps

03

covered scenarios

Typical first case

Researcher forgetting informed consent in the initial submission.

Guided checklist

What this flow requests before the case gets escalated.

Study protocols

Informed consents

Researcher CVs

Insurance and approvals

Operating flow

How the case moves from private link to decision.

Manage the reception and validation of protocols for ethical review.

1

The researcher uploads requirements to the private portal.

2

Alistus confirms the presence of key files.

3

The committee receives complete records ready for decision.

Expected impact

What the operation gains when intake stops living across scattered channels.

Faster sessions

Zero incomplete records

Regulatory traceability

Common cases

Queries this flow helps organize more clearly.

Researcher forgetting informed consent in the initial submission.

Committee having to postpone evaluations due to missing basic documents.

Difficulty maintaining version history of a corrected protocol.

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers before requesting access.

Does it allow multiple reviews?

Yes. Correction rounds can be managed on the same record.

Is it secure?

Yes. Access is restricted and data is encrypted.

Request private access

I want to evaluate this flow for my operation.

Tell us what kind of cases you receive today and how they are filtered before the team loses time.

Your data stays secure. We contact you about this request.